Friday, September 11, 2015

Interference with a writ that was not to be seen

Carol Gustin, attorney for Deanna Jo Robinson and Levi, explains why an indictment for interference with child custody is a no go in court 
Greenville, TX – On March 4 of this year, more than one and a half million YouTube viewers worldwide watched in shocked disbelief as a Hunt County Deputy beat a woman in the thirty-eighth week of her pregnancy with a closed fist because she asked to see the legal instrument by which he, another deputy and a Quinlan city police officer seized her 18-month old son.
Though Grand Jurors were confronted with the evidence that the officer used a closed fist to repeatedly punch Deanna Jo Robinson in the area of her kidneys as they bent her over a kitchen counter at her mother and father’s house, they declined to indict him for the assault more than a million persons viewed on their computers and smartphones.
A equally amazed worldwide audience reacted with disbelief when the mother of the child seized became the subject of a felony indictment for “intentionally or knowingly” seeking to retain her son Landry against a writ of attachment she asked to see, but was denied by a Texas Child Protective Services worker.
READ MORE:http://radiolegendary.com/2015/09/interference-with-a-writ-that-was-not-to-be-seen/

No comments:

Post a Comment