Carol Gustin, attorney for Deanna Jo Robinson and Levi,
explains why an indictment for interference with child custody is a no
go in court
Greenville, TX – On March 4 of this year, more than one and a half
million YouTube viewers worldwide watched in shocked disbelief as a Hunt
County Deputy beat a woman in the thirty-eighth week of her pregnancy
with a closed fist because she asked to see the legal instrument by
which he, another deputy and a Quinlan city police officer seized her
18-month old son.
Though Grand Jurors were confronted with the evidence that the
officer used a closed fist to repeatedly punch Deanna Jo Robinson in the
area of her kidneys as they bent her over a kitchen counter at her
mother and father’s house, they declined to indict him for the assault
more than a million persons viewed on their computers and smartphones.
A equally amazed worldwide audience reacted with disbelief when the
mother of the child seized became the subject of a felony indictment for
“intentionally or knowingly” seeking to retain her son Landry against a
writ of attachment she asked to see, but was denied by a Texas Child
Protective Services worker.
READ MORE:http://radiolegendary.com/2015/09/interference-with-a-writ-that-was-not-to-be-seen/
No comments:
Post a Comment