It might sound like a trailer for the latest
action film, but this is what happened to Annette Shattuck, a mother of
four and a registered marijuana caregiver in Michigan. As she recently testified to
the Michigan House of Representatives, her house was raided in 2014
while her 56-year old mother was taking care of her children. Everything
from food, electronics, and vehicles to birth certificates, cash, and
social security, insurance and public assistance cards was taken and
has yet to be returned. As if this weren’t enough, she was left
penniless due to a $1 million hold on all her bank accounts and has been
unable to access the adoption subsidy for her special-needs son.
Civil asset forfeiture laws, which were
popularized during the drug war hysteria of the 1980s, allow law
enforcement to seize money and any other private property, regardless of
whether its owner has been convicted of a crime. Not only does this
constitute a violation of civil liberties and property rights, but it
also fuels widespread abuse of power.
Law enforcement agencies are incentivized to confiscate goods since they get to keep 70-100% of the profits, which go towards new equipment and police militarization. As of 2012, the Asset Forfeiture Fund was estimated to hold around $6 billion, so it is no surprise that cases like Annette’s and racist property seizures in public spaces have become a jackpot for law enforcement.The Drug Policy Alliance’s recent report, Above the Law: An Investigation of Civil Asset Forfeiture Abuses in California, reveals the troubling extent to which California law enforcement agencies have violated state and federal law.
READ MORE:http://www.blacklistednews.com/Civil_Asset_Forfeiture%3A_Guilty_Until_Proven_Innocent/44902/0/38/38/Y/M.html
No comments:
Post a Comment